Prevalence
and Risk Factors for Antepartum Depression
Hafsat
Abdullahi Maikudi *1, Rabi’at
Muhammad Aliyu2, Aishatu
Abubakar-Abdullateef3,
Rahmatu Yunusa Yusuf1, Shafa’atu
Ismail Sada2
1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,
Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria; 2. Department of Obstetrics
and Gynaecology, Ahmadu Bello University/ Ahmadu Bello University Teaching
Hospital, Zaria; 3. Department of Psychiatry, College of Medical Sciences,
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.
ABSTRACT
Background: Pregnancy increases the susceptibility of
women to mental health disorders, especially depression. Depression is more
prevalent in low and middle-income countries and is associated with adverse
maternal and perinatal morbidity. However, screening for depression is not
routinely offered to pregnant women in this setting. Aim: To determine the prevalence of
antepartum depression (APD); describe the characteristics of the depressed
women and identify the risk factors for antepartum depression among women attending
the antenatal clinic of the study hospital. Methodology: A
cross-sectional study where 250 women attending antenatal clinics were
recruited. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to obtain
relevant information on socio-demographic characteristics and obstetric
history. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used to screen for
depression and a score of 13 and above was considered positive for depression.
Data was analysed using SPSS version 28. P value <0.05 was considered significant.
Results:
The prevalence of antepartum depression was 6.4% (16/250). The majority of
women with antepartum depression were aged ≤35 years (15/16), of the Islamic faith (14/16); had
tertiary education (10/16); had low income (12/16) but had spouses with higher
income (12/16) and reported no history of marital conflict (10/16). These women
were predominantly parous (15/16); in the third trimester (11/16) and had no
bad obstetric history (14/16). Tribe and gestational age were associated with
APD (p<0.05). Younger women had doubled odds of having APD (OR 2.3, CI
0.29-17.9).
Educational level, income, parity, presence of marital conflict and bad
obstetric history were not associated with the risk of having APD. Conclusion:
APD is common and occurs across
all educational levels, socio-economic and obstetric statuses. Gestational age
was associated with APD. Screening for APD should be integrated among
antenatal packages that promote maternal and perinatal health, especially in
the third trimester.
Keywords: Antepartum
Depression, Prevalence, Risk Factors, Maternal, Perinatal Morbidity.
*Correspondence
Hafsat Abdullahi Maikudi,
Department of Obstetrics
and Gynaecology,
Ahmadu Bello University
Teaching Hospital, Zaria.
hafsahmaikudi@gmail.com
INTRODUCTION
The
promotion of mental health has been recognized as one of the needed means of
improving the overall health and well-being of people worldwide.
Depression is twice as common in women compared to men
with increasing prevalence in the reproductive age group and a significant
proportion of women usually have features of depression manifesting for the
first time during pregnancy.
A previous history of psychosocial disorder may herald
the occurrence of APD. However, several factors increase the likelihood of
developing depressive disorder in pregnancy which include but are not limited
to low socio-economic status, bad obstetric history, young maternal age or
domestic violence.
Nigeria is among the countries with leading maternal
and perinatal morbidity and mortality.
Mental health has an impact in achieving the
sustainable development goals.
METHODOLOGY
It was a descriptive
cross-sectional study conducted among antenatal clinic attendees within the
study period (February-May, 2022). Pregnant women from six (6) weeks to
42 weeks of gestation were conveniently sampled till sample size was attained.
Pregnant women in labour and those who did not consent were excluded. The
following formula
Using
the convenience sampling technique, a
structured questionnaire was administered by trained research assistants to
eligible participants after obtaining verbal consent. Strict confidentiality was maintained and all
participants received their due antenatal care. The structured questionnaire
was organized into three (3) sections: a socio-demographic and reproductive
profile section, an obstetric history section and a section on the Edinburgh Postnatal
Depression Scale (EPDS). The questions under EPDS were translated into the
predominant native language (Hausa) which was the commonest language understood
by attendees. The scale was used to screen for depression among pregnant women.
The scale had a total of 10 questions. The cut-off points for depression used
in this study was 13 or above.
The data was analyzed using SPSS version 28. Frequency
tables were generated for the socio-demographic and reproductive variables. The
Chi-square was used to assess the association between the variables and the
development of antepartum depression. The level of significance for this study
was set at ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS
A
total of 250 questionnaires were administered and all were responded to
appropriately giving a response rate of 100%. The majority (86.1%) of the
respondents were between the ages of 25 to 44 years with a mean age of 28.4
years ± 3 years. Hausa ethnicity and Islamic faith were the predominant tribe
and religion of the respondents seen in 64% and 77.6% respectively. All the
respondents were married and most had a tertiary level of education (68.4%).
These are shown in Table 1.
Table
1: Socio-demographic Characteristics of the Women in a Study of Prevalence and Risk
Factors for Antepartum Depression Among Women Attending Antenatal Clinic
Characteristic
|
Frequency
(%) n=250 |
Age
(years) |
|
20-24 |
1(0.9) |
25-29 |
16(13.9) |
30-34 |
30(26.1) |
35-39 |
35(30.4) |
40-44 |
18(15.7) |
45-49 |
8(7.0) |
50-54 |
7(6.2) |
Tribe |
|
Hausa |
160(64.0) |
Yoruba
|
25(10.0) |
Igbo |
8 (3.2) |
Others
|
57(22.8) |
Religion
|
|
Islam |
194(77.6) |
Christianity
|
56(22.4) |
Woman’s
education |
|
Primary |
8(3.2) |
Secondary
|
71(28.4) |
Tertiary |
171(68.4) |
Woman’s income (Naira per month) |
|
≤10,000 |
170(67.6) |
>10,000 |
80(32.4) |
Spouse’s income (Naira per month) |
|
≤10,000 |
64(25.6) |
>10,000 |
186(74.4) |
The majority of the respondents were
multiparous (73.2%) and 49.2% had 1-3 living children. Most of the index
pregnancies were planned (72%) and the women were in their third trimester
(68.8%). These are highlighted in Table 2.
The majority of women with antepartum depression were
aged ≤35 years (15/16), of the Islamic
faith (14/16); had tertiary education (10/16); had low income (12/16) but had
spouses with higher income (12/16) and reported no history of marital conflict
(10/16).
Table
2: Reproductive Profile of Women in a Study of Prevalence and Risk Factors for
Antepartum Depression Among Women Attending Antenatal Clinic
Characteristic
|
Frequency (%) |
Parity |
|
Primigravida |
67(26.8) |
Multipara |
183(73.2) |
Number
of miscarriages |
|
None
|
158(63.2) |
1-3 |
89(35.6) |
4-6 |
3(1.2) |
Number
of living children |
|
None |
98(39.2) |
1-3 |
123(49.2) |
4-6 |
20(8.0) |
7-9 |
9(3.6) |
Pregnancy intention |
|
Intended |
180(72) |
Unintended |
70(28) |
Trimester |
|
First |
9(3.6) |
Second |
69(27.6) |
Third |
172(68.8) |
The
prevalence of antepartum depression was found to be 6.4% as shown in Table 3.
Table 3: Prevalence
of Antepartum Depression, in a Study of Prevalence and Risk Factors
for Antepartum Depression Among Women Attending Antenatal Clinic
EPDS score |
Frequency (%) |
< 13 |
234(93.6) |
≥ 13 |
16(6.4) |
Total |
250(100.0) |
These women were predominantly
parous (15/16); in the third trimester (11/16) and had no bad obstetric history
(14/16). These are shown in Tables 4 and 5.
Only tribe was found to be associated with antepartum
depression (p=0.0006). Though women aged ≤ 35 years and of Islamic faith had double odds of having
antepartum depression, the associations were not significant. Lesser education and income of the woman
slightly increased the odds of having antepartum depression
but the associations were also not
significant (p>0.05). These are shown in Table 4.
Gestational
age was associated with antepartum depression (p=0.0001) and women in the third
trimester had 10-fold odds of being depressed
(OR 10.0;
3.06-32.91). Parity and the presence of a bad obstetric history (BOH)
which was defined as the history of three or more consecutive
miscarriages, a stillbirth or a neonatal death, were not
associated with antepartum depression as shown in Table 5
DISCUSSION
Maternal
mental health has in recent times gained traction as an integral part of the
discussion surrounding maternal health mortality, morbidity and even neonatal
outcomes. While more
attention is often paid to mental health well-being after delivery, antenatal
mental health is also crucial as it may lead to adverse consequences not only
for the mother but for the growing fetus and family
The prevalence of antepartum depression in this study
was found to be 6.4%, lower than the range of antepartum depression reported in
other studies in Nigeria and other parts of sub-Saharan Africa
Though not significantly associated with antepartum
depression, respondents in our study who were less than 35 years of age (94%)
had a higher representation among those who screened positive as were those
with a low income (75%), parous (94%), and those in the third trimester (69%),
all of which are socio-demographic variables that have been reported in other
studies to be associated with antepartum depression
Similar to the findings of Okagbue
et al,
Interestingly, the analysis showed tribe as a
significant factor associated with APD. Tribal identity is heavily entrenched
in the fabric of communal consciousness in the country and maybe a source of
perceived stress through a variety of ways
Our study has some limitations. The Edinburgh
Postnatal Depression scale is a screening tool and not a diagnostic tool making
it necessary to establish links between obstetric and psychiatric teams for
case confirmation, referral and management. Also, our study was cross-sectional
in design and only determined associations as it was not adequately powered to
assess for causal factors. In addition, the convenient sampling method adopted
has an inbuilt researcher bias, unequal representativeness and generalization
is limited. Finally, this was an institutional study that assessed only those
who sought antenatal care. It did not include non-seekers with different
sociodemographic features and findings cannot be extended to the general
population.
CONCLUSION
In
conclusion, findings from this study show that depression is prevalent in the antepartum
period among women in the region. Maternal and infant health policies and
protocols in the region should integrate maternal mental health into antenatal
care services. There is a need for randomized control studies and further
research into predictive causal models.
REFERENCE
1.
World
Health Organization. (2019). The WHO special initiative for mental health
(2019-2023): universal health coverage for mental health. World Health
Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/310981. License: CC
BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
2.
Fried
EI. The 52 symptoms of major depression: Lack of content overlap among seven
common depression scales. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan;208:191–7.
3.
Ridley
M, Rao G, Schilbach F, Patel V. Poverty, depression,
and anxiety: Causal evidence and mechanisms. Science (1979). 2020 Dec
11;370(6522).
4.
Jeong
HG, Lim JS, Lee MS, Kim SH, Jung IK, Joe SH. The association of psychosocial
factors and obstetric history with depression in pregnant women: Focus on the
role of emotional support. General Hospital Psychiatry. 2013;35(4):354–8.
5.
Gelaye
B, Rondon MB, Araya R, Williams MA. Epidemiology of
maternal depression, risk factors, and child outcomes in low-income and
middle-income countries. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(10):973–82.
6.
Babu
GR, Murthy GVS, Singh N, Nath A, Rathnaiah M,
Saldanha N, et al. Sociodemographic and Medical Risk Factors Associated With Antepartum Depression. Front Public Health. 2018;6.
7.
Schaffir
J. Consequences of antepartum depression. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018;61(3):533–43.
8.
Olonade
O, Olawande TI, Alabi OJ, Imhonopi
D. Maternal Mortality and Maternal Health Care in Nigeria: Implications for
Socio-Economic Development. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Mar
16;7(5):849–55.
9.
Bolarinwa
O. Sample size estimation for health and social science researchers: The
principles and considerations for different study designs. Nigerian
Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2020;27(2):67.
10. Fekadu Dadi A, Miller ER, Mwanri L. Antenatal depression and its association with
adverse birth outcomes in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review
and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0227323.
11. Gyang BA, Musa U, Michael AT, Davou
GM, Taiwo OJ. Effect of Antenatal Depression on Fetal
Growth Outcomes at the Jos University Teaching Hospital Jos, Plateau State,
Nigeria. Open J Psychiatr. 2022;12(04):336–44.
12. Okunola TO, Awoleke
JO, Olofinbiyi B, Rosiji B,
Olubiyi AO, Omoya S.
Predictors of postpartum depression among an obstetric population in
South-Western Nigeria. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;
13. Sulyman D, Aminu M, Ayanda K, Dattijo L. Antepartum depression among women attending
antenatal clinic in a Nigerian teaching hospital. Nigerian Journal of Medicine.
2021;30(5):556.
14. Okocha AN, Abbey M, Amadi SC, Ononuju CN, Adewale O.
Family Support as a Determinant of Major Depression among Pregnant Women in a
Low-resource Setting. AsianResJGynaecolObst.
2023;6(1):121–32.
15. Abbey M, Kasso T. Depression in
pregnancy and the puerperium in a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. A
neglected area of practice. Nigerian Journal of Medicine. 2017;26(2):146.
16. Izuka E, Iyidobu T, Obiora-Izuka
C, Enebe J, Onyeabochukwu
A, Nkwo P, et al. Evaluation of Anxiety and
Depression among Pregnant Women in Enugu, Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2023 Sep;26(9):1368–76.
17. Adeoye IA, Sogbesan
A, Esan O. Prevalence, associated factors and perinatal outcomes of antepartum
depression in Ibadan Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1).
18. Thompson O, Ajayi I. Prevalence of
Antenatal Depression and Associated Risk Factors among Pregnant Women Attending
Antenatal Clinics in Abeokuta North Local Government Area, Nigeria. Depress Res
Treat. 2016;2016:1–15.
19. Okagbue HI, Adamu PI, Bishop SA, Oguntunde PE, Opanuga AA, Akhmetshin EM. Systematic Review of Prevalence of
Antepartum Depression during the Trimesters of Pregnancy. Open Access Maced J
Med Sci. 2019 May 15;7(9):1555–60.
20. Abdulhamid Z, Lawal U, Tahir A, Harande M, Usman H, Nuhu A. Perceptions of Hausa and Fulani
Tribes on Traditional Birth Attendants in Zaria Local Government Area, Kaduna
State, Nigeria. Journal of Complementary and Alternative Medical Research. 2017
Jan 10;2(2):1–7.
21. Nweke KO, Anazonwu
CO, Ezendu AN, Umeaku NNkemdilim, Oluwafemi O, Ugboaku
PU, et al. Influence of Mother’s Marital Status and Ethnicity on Perceived
Depressive Symptoms. NigPsyResearch.
2022;7(2):99–109.
22. Dean J, Keshavan M. The neurobiology
of depression: An integrated view. Asian J Psychiatr.
2017 Jun; 27:101–11.